AI Fluency Learning · Workshop kit

Train the Trainer

Everything you need to run an AI fluency workshop for colleagues, in your voice: the session plan with facilitation notes, the exercises, and a participant workbook. Written for educators, and adaptable to any team. Complete the pK–12 or Educators course first, so you have built your own fluency before guiding others through it.

4 partsFull session plan~90 min prepPoints
0% Complete
Not started
What you'll learn
  • Run the full workshop: inner loop, break, outer loop, commit
  • Facilitate the delegation matrix and the CHECK method
  • Hold the three guiding rules, especially the data rule
  • Close with written commitments that actually happen
Part 01 · ~5 min

From learner to trainer

If you have completed an AI fluency course, you already have the foundation: the framework, the guardrails, and the judgment. This kit turns that foundation outward. AI is reshaping work and education right now, and the decisions being made today will shape both for years. The people closest to the impact have to be in the room when those decisions get made, and no algorithm can replicate the relational, human work at the heart of teaching and leading.

Deliver it in your voice. The kit gives you the structure; the credibility in the room is yours.

Part 02 · ~10 min

How to use the kit

Three pieces:

  1. The session plan (part 3 below): the full workshop, section by section, with facilitation notes for every move: what to say, how long it takes, and what to watch for.
  2. The exercises, embedded in the plan: warm-ups, the delegation matrix, and grade-band practice pairs at two depths.
  3. The participant workbook (part 4): what your participants work through as you facilitate. Print it or share it; their answers stay theirs.

Preparation: read the session plan twice, run each exercise yourself once, and personalize the opening: one real, relatable AI moment of your own lowers the stakes for everyone.

Part 03 · the full workshop · ~3 hours of room time

The session plan

Shape: welcome and warm-up, Part A (the inner loop) with exercises, a 15-minute break, Part B (the outer loop) with exercises, then commit and close. Hands-on and judgment-first, not a tech lecture.

Welcome (20 min)

Outcomes to name out loud: participants will be able to define AI fluency, apply the 4D framework as a mental model, prompt and check outputs effectively, and connect AI fluency to professional skills they already have. Frame these as a promise for the session, not a test.

Learning norms, under a minute: use your voice, honor collaboration, participate actively, be flexible, respect differing opinions, share your gift. Invite the room to add one.

Warm-up: "Have you ever...?"

Used an AI tool to write a plan or document? Felt unsure if an AI resource was accurate? Wondered if someone submitted AI-written work? Copy-pasted AI output without reviewing it? Wanted to use AI but did not know where to start?

Silent check-in 1 minute, pair-share 2 minutes, table patterns 5 minutes, then a few voices to the room. The goal is not perfection; it is awareness. Facilitation note: bridge into the framework with "you are already doing pieces of this."

Three guiding rules, stated plainly: (1) no prior knowledge assumed, whether you have never opened a chatbot or use AI daily, you belong here; (2) use your organization's approved tool, because the skills transfer and what you are building is judgment, not just technique; (3) nothing that identifies a student, client, or beneficiary goes into any AI tool. Say rule three plainly, then pause. It is the non-negotiable.

Why AI fluency (10 min)

The literacy ladder: digital literacy asks "can I use this technology?"; AI literacy asks "do I understand what this is?"; AI fluency asks "can I work with this well, on my own terms?" Use the food analogy: you can know a lot about food without being a good cook.

Four myths to bust: digital literacy is not AI literacy; AI literacy is not AI fluency; you do not need to be a tech expert (fluency is built on professional judgment, critical thinking, and domain knowledge); and more use does not equal more fluency, because knowing when not to use AI is a core marker.

The framework (10 min)

Say this early

You are the expert in this room. You know your people, your standards, and your community in ways AI never will. AI can speed up the work; deciding what is right stays with you.

The 4Ds in one line each: Delegation, what tasks are right for AI? Description, what do you need AI to do? Discernment, is the output high quality? Diligence, how do you take responsibility? Inner loop = Description and Discernment, the everyday cycle. Outer loop = Delegation and Diligence, the whether and how much.

Part A: the inner loop (45 min)

Prompting model, "a great prompt is like a good handover note": Role (who the AI should be), Task (the specific goal), Context (background and examples), Format (the exact output shape), Constraint (limits and guardrails).

Discernment, the CHECK method: Correct? Verify facts with outside sources. Human? Warm and authentic. Equitable? Free of bias and harmful assumptions. Curriculum-aligned (or standards-aligned for your field)? Kid-safe (or audience-safe)? Have the room say CHECK back once; spoken mnemonics stick.

Why discernment matters: hallucination is a plausible pattern not grounded in reality; sycophancy is the model telling you what you want to hear; bias is AI reproducing inequalities in its data. Facilitation note: research shows discernment behaviors are used least frequently when people engage with AI. Slow down here; this is the heart of the inner loop. Reassure the room: description is like planning a lesson or writing a handover, and discernment is like grading or reviewing. They already do this thinking.

Inner-loop practice (~10 min per exercise, pick per audience)
  • Early years: retell a familiar picture book three ways (for a language newcomer, with rhyme, focused on one feeling); which works in your room, and why? Or: rewrite a family update at three reading levels and in two home languages; which would you actually send?
  • Elementary: the misconception hunter (five common misconceptions on this week's topic; which have you actually seen, and which feel made up?). Or: decode academic content into everyday caregiver language plus one at-home action.
  • Middle: five discussion questions at five levels of cognitive demand. Or: five welcoming start-of-year questions for caregivers; what assumptions did the AI make?
  • High school / adult teams: build the strongest case for both sides of a contested topic; did the AI flatten either argument? Or: draft a follow-up email from real meeting notes; does it match what actually happened?

Debrief: what surprised you, and where did your discernment catch something an AI-trusting colleague would have missed?

Break (15 min). State the return time and hold to it.

Part B: the outer loop (75 min)

Two-minute re-entry: turn to someone new and share one thing from Part A.

The quote to let land, with a pause

Your judgment is not the obstacle to good AI use. Your judgment is the entire point of good AI use.

The delegation matrix (12 min, small groups)

Sort tasks by impact and AI risk into four quadrants: high impact + low risk = delegate fully; high + high = delegate with review; low + low = delegate occasionally; low impact + high risk = keep human. Seed tasks: a first-draft rubric or template, a newsletter, identifying people who need extra support, feedback on someone's draft, building relationships, planning a hard conversation. Groups place each, add their own, and defend one placement. The disagreements are the learning.

Some work is the work because you do it. A reflective letter, a hard conversation, the thinking you do to understand why someone is struggling. AI taking it from you does not save time; it removes the point.

Diligence in practice, three moves: Verify (facts, reading level, anything that could mislead). Own (revise until it sounds like you and reflects your judgment, not the AI's defaults). Disclose (if AI helped produce it, say so; transparency is part of the professional standard).

Data protection block: use only approved tools; never paste anything that identifies a person (de-identify: "Student 1," "Client A"); assume inputs may be retained, and read the policies. Then the one-minute quiz, high energy: 60 seconds, list every kind of personally identifiable information you can. Rapid-fire review: names, ID numbers, dates of birth, addresses, photos, case status, health records, grades, contact details. None of it belongs in an AI tool.

Outer-loop practice (~15 min, gates on)

Pick one real task. Before opening the tool: write what AI will touch and what stays yours, and check tool and data. After: write how you will verify and whether you would sign your name to it. Variants per audience: audit a month of outgoing communication into "AI can draft" / "AI structures, words stay mine" / "AI does not touch"; stress-test a draft policy by having AI argue against it from three perspectives; write a one-sentence AI disclosure and see if it changes how the message reads.

Commit and close (15 min)

Real fluency means moving between the loops without thinking about which one you are in. That is not a failure of the framework; that is the framework working.

The commitment ritual: everyone writes one real task, not a hypothetical, that they will bring AI into this week, on a card. Collect them at the door or have people keep them; a written commitment is far more likely to happen. Close warm and specific, restate the commitments, and end on time.

Exit pulse against the four outcomes: comfortable teaching it, learned something new, or still unsure. Normalize "still unsure"; it names where to keep practicing.

Part 04 · the participant workbook

The participant workbook

Give this structure to participants, on paper or as a document. It turns the workshop into something they do.

  1. Before you start, three guardrails: no prior knowledge needed; use your organization's approved tool; never enter anything that identifies a person.
  2. Warm up: the "Have you ever...?" checklist, plus one line: "One AI moment I want to get better at: ___."
  3. The 4Ds at a glance: the two loops, four one-line definitions.
  4. Activity 1, describe it then CHECK it: a real low-stakes task; build the prompt with Role, Task, Context, Format, Constraint; run CHECK on the output; note what you would change before using it.
  5. Activity 2, the delegation matrix: sort the six seed tasks into the four quadrants, then add two of your own.
  6. Activity 3, run the gates: a real task; what AI touches and what stays yours (before); how you will verify and disclose (after).
  7. Commit and close: "This week I will ___" (real, not hypothetical), and the exit self-assessment: comfortable teaching it / learned something new / still unsure.
Yours to remix

This kit, like everything on this learning hub, is openly licensed (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Take it, adapt it to your room, and run it under your own name, with attribution. If you run it, we would genuinely like to hear how it went: hello@ailiteracyfoundation.eu.

Attribution. Adapted from the AI Fluency for pK-12 Train the Trainer kit, copyright Anthropic and the American Federation of Teachers, based on the AI Fluency Framework by Prof. Rick Dakan (Ringling College of Art and Design) and Prof. Joseph Feller (University College Cork), CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. This adaptation © 2026 AI Literacy Foundation, shared under the same license, generalized from the classroom to any team while keeping the classroom exercises.